Most of the history written, philosophies, and social
sciences come from the western world (Euro-American). Recently there has been a counter force
challenging the exclusive western perception.
For example, IQ tests and even personality tests used to diagnose
abnormal behavior are based upon western ideals of normal and average. One particular western ideal is
individualism. You hear it everyday. “Be independent.” “Make your own
decisions.” “Stand on your own two feet.” “Pay your own way.” “Follow your heart.” Think of the pride Americans take in our
history of forging out across the unknown lands to settle, populate and tame
the wild west. We are rugged
individualists. That is not the same
concept or value held in much of the eastern world. In the eastern culture, collectivism, or the
group is the most important value. It
does not mean that you demean or diminish yourself as an individual but simply
that the health of the group (family, community, society, etc.) takes
precedence. The collectivist point of
view would not brag about individual accomplishments, would not promote one
over the many.
A very inadequate summary, my apologies. But can you see how the two perspectives
would write different histories, develop different philosophies and define
normal differently? Even spiritually, can you see how their world view would
differ from the western view? If the east –west concept is too vague, consider
the rural farming communities of old built on cooperation of neighbors and embraced
within an extended family of support.
Their individual survival, what was important, was the survival of all,
together, a community. Compare that view
to a large metropolitian city like New York where most feel like a stranger to
the other million or so people. No nuclear
families. If you have more I must have
less. Competitive and individualistic.
Is one view right or wrong? Is one healthy and one sick?
Maybe we should just say they both are right and melt them into a stew of
indicollectivism. And where the hell am
I going with such a pondering? The scientific Human Genome Project set out to
map all the human genomes to map our evolutionary, biological and comparative
history. So far, they have identified
only 25,000 or so unique genomes – they were expecting much more. Of those 25,000 do you know we only have 300
that are unique from those of a mouse?
We are all so similar to all of life and yet we are so different. Differences can be modified but the
differences remain, perhaps even sacred to all of life.
When I say I love you or when I say you are my other me –
who are you? You have been shaped by
your family. You have been shaped by your community, religion, school and
experiences or even the color of your skin.
You are a repository of collective images, labels, definitions and
perceptions of right and wrong, normal and not, good and evil, cans and
cannots. But you are also the individual
I see, the individual I love, the person standing in front of me. And within
that repository you have made choices that in many ways reshaped the collective
influence, making you, you. The you
standing before me, holding my hand or my heart, may be the mouse in you, the
collective and shared you. Tomorrow, you
may be the 300 genomes, shaped by your choices that make you uniquely human and
an individual. Both are you. It’s not
that you bring your “baggage” or wounds, you simply bring who you are. It is not a “take it or leave it” attitude,
we all have rough edges we would like to soften and habits we know we need to
change. But it begins with
acceptance. It begins with the wonder
and amazement as the “you” unfolds before me. So many layers. So much to
discover. Your vulnerability to let me
see, so humbling.
My point? I chuckle, yes, sometimes I do think too
much. To say I love you or to embrace
you are my other me means my heart reaches out to all of you, today, this
moment, the face that you gift to me.
And in that embrace, that joining as one, we create a symphony not a
solo, dialogue not a soliloquy, two yet one, and we expand, together, beyond
what we were before the embrace. In
learning how to love myself I expand the love I can give to you. You are my other me. You are not me. Like holding hands, it is more
comfortable and warm when right holds left, awkward when left holds left or
right holds right. But when the two hands slip and fold together, a link is
created that makes them one. You are my
other me. You are my teacher. You are the telescope that opens up the universe
or the submarine beneath the oceans opening up such a vast diverse
universe. You are the one hand slipped
warmly into mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment